Private Internet Access Review 2026
We may earn a commission from links on this page at no extra cost to you.
VPNInfobase verdict
6
Speed
8.4
Privacy
8.8
Price
9.2
Features
8.8
UX
Overall: 4.2/5 — Largest network
Private Internet Access (PIA) is the high-volume budget workhorse: enormous server counts, unlimited devices, open-source apps, and multi-year pricing that can undercut almost everyone. It is also US-based and owned by Kape Technologies — facts privacy-conscious buyers must weigh explicitly.
If your goal is cheap, configurable tunneling for torrenting and everyday browsing — and you accept Five Eyes jurisdiction with audited no-logs claims — PIA remains compelling. If your threat model is “avoid US legal reach,” look at Nord, Express, Proton, or Mullvad instead.
The app is more utilitarian than Express; power users who like knobs will feel at home, beginners may prefer Surfshark's simpler packaging.
Overview
PIA advertises one of the largest consumer VPN footprints (35,000+ servers / 91 countries in our data). WireGuard, OpenVPN, and IKEv2 are supported. Unlimited devices match Surfshark's household-friendly approach.
Open-source apps and repeated Deloitte audits are meaningful positives. SOCKS5 proxies and granular configuration appeal to advanced users. MACE provides tracker/ad blocking at the VPN layer.
Ownership and US base are the recurring criticisms. Audits reduce — they do not eliminate — jurisdiction risk. Read the ownership context before buying solely on price.
Speed test results
We measured around 600 Mbps class peaks nearby — perfectly fine for streaming and downloads, not the leaderboard. With so many servers, performance variance by city is real; try multiple nearby locations during the refund period.
| Server | Download | Upload | Ping |
|---|---|---|---|
| US (New York) | 570 Mbps | 528 Mbps | 12ms |
| UK (London) | 552 Mbps | 510 Mbps | 28ms |
| Germany | 534 Mbps | 492 Mbps | 35ms |
| Japan (Tokyo) | 468 Mbps | 426 Mbps | 112ms |
Privacy and security
Deloitte-audited no-logs is necessary for a US VPN to be credible. Still, US jurisdiction means different legal exposure than Panama or Switzerland. Open-source clients help transparency.
Kill switch, split tunneling, and obfuscation options (including Shadowsocks in some setups) exist, but China-class censorship reliability is inconsistent industry-wide — do not buy any consumer VPN solely for that use case without testing.
No-logs policy: Audited (Deloitte 2022, 2024, 2025)
Jurisdiction: USA
- Kill switch: Yes
- Split tunneling: Yes
- Double VPN: No
- Tor over VPN: No
- Obfuscation: Yes (Shadowsocks)
- RAM-only servers: Yes
- Open source: Yes (all apps)
Pricing
Three-year promos can land near €1.69/mo — among the lowest premium-feature prices we track. That only works if you are comfortable prepaying long term. 30-day money-back is your safety valve; do not skip real-world testing.
| Plan | Price/mo | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly | €11.99 | No commitment |
| Best plan | €1.69/mo | Billed for 3 years upfront |
Money-back guarantee: 30 days
Pros and cons
Pros
- Largest server network (35,000+)
- Open-source apps
- Deloitte audited 3x
- Unlimited devices
- Very cheap long-term
- MACE ad blocker
Cons
- US jurisdiction (Five Eyes)
- Kape Technologies ownership
- Shadowsocks unreliable in China
- Older interface design
Private Internet Access
Our #1 pick
Largest network — Largest server network (35,000+). 30 days money-back guarantee.
From €1.69/mo · 30-day money-back guarantee
Get Private Internet AccessAffiliate link · we may earn a commission
Who should use Private Internet Access
Best for
- Budget buyers who want unlimited devices and huge server choice
- Torrenting and highly configurable desktop setups
- Users who like open-source clients and do not mind US jurisdiction
Skip if
- Anyone avoiding Five Eyes jurisdiction on principle
- Buyers sensitive to Kape portfolio consolidation concerns
- Users who want the simplest beginner UX
Final verdict
PIA scores 4.2/5 with a Largest network badge. Excellent price-to-feature ratio, with jurisdiction/ownership as the asterisk.
Take the multi-year deal only after you accept the US/Kape context. Otherwise Surfshark (value) or Nord (overall) are cleaner stories.
Better alternatives?
- Surfshark Review
Similar unlimited devices with non-US jurisdiction
- NordVPN Review
Stronger overall pick if you can spend a bit more
- Mullvad Review
Privacy-first alternative without US corporate structure
VPNInfobase
Editorial publisher
VPNInfobase publishes desk-researched comparisons and guides. A page should identify its method and supporting evidence before it makes a first-hand testing claim.
About our methodology →